It’s funny, every year someone asks Mo’Kelly and every year has to give the same answer multiple times.
“No, Mo’Kelly did not go to the __________ awards show.” Fill in the blank as you see fit. It’s a reasonable question, given my professional vocation, and many years living and existing in the entertainment arena.
In fact, there were some years in which I worked at the National Academy of Recording Arts & Sciences, better known as the Grammy Awards. In other words, Mo'Kelly's had more than had his fill and doesn't ever really care to ever attend another awards show…except maybe the Oscars, to pick up his award for Best Original Screenplay...one day.
That said, Mo’Kelly was flipping channels Sunday evening and happened upon Ryan Seacrest getting summarily dissed and dismissed by actress Angelina Jolie on the Golden Globes' red carpet. If you didn’t see the hilarious moment, Seacrest attempted four times (once on camera) to get Jolie’s attention on live television with four different questions.
Jolie stonewalled him each time.
For those who thought maybe she didn’t “hear” Seacrest, know that Seacrest was certain points standing directly next to her in a space close enough to smell each other’s breath. It reminded Mo’Kelly of those embarrassing moments at the club when guys unsuccessfully try to strike up conversation with that gorgeous woman at the bar. Before you can get the one-syllable word “hi” out of your mouth, she looks you in the eye, frowns and turns her back before the soundwaves from your greeting can reach her. You look left and then right to see else was watching…then bend over and pick up your face.
THAT was Ryan Seacrest, except instead of only half the club witnessing, it was half the world watching Seacrest literally chase Jolie down the red carpet with microphone and cracked grill in hand. The video below only shows his first diss of four.
FOUR!
In addition to his entertainment duties for the E! channel, Seacrest also hosts a morning show in
“I asked her four questions and she didn’t even answer me,” he complained. “I literally stood there and tried to ask a couple of questions. At one point I just kind of let the E! microphone sit in front of her for a second to see if she was going to acknowledge it, and she clearly wanted nothing to do with me or my question or my answer or any of it.”
When posed with the possibility that Jolie wasn’t in the “mood” to answer questions, Seacrest had this to say.
“Well then don’t go, (to the awards show).” Don’t go. Don’t go support your man (Brad Pitt). Don’t go."
That’s strange. Seacrest as both a media AND entertainment personality should know better. As a radio/TV host, he should innately understand that there are some shows, some interviewers, some journalists who celebrities will not give interviews. And yes, it’s personal and yes, it’s their prerogative. Take The Mo’Kelly Report for example. Not everybody is a fan…and Mo’Kelly gets that, for obvious reasons.
What Seacrest doesn’t tell you and consciously omits is that despite his “American-Idol” connotations, he is relatively well-known as an ass in
Angelina Jolie doesn’t “owe” anyone on the red carpet an interview. One can argue that her public profile is “better served” by accommodating as many television journalists as possible on such an occasion as the Golden Globes, but you can best believe when an actress of her visibility and caliber consciously ignores someone with the visibility of Ryan Seacrest, it’s personal.
And “personally,” Seacrest is known to be a jerk.
If you’ve ever spent any time around him or on his show productions, it was well-known how “unusual” it was for Seacrest to have ANY African-Americans in his employ, and don’t get it twisted, he inherited Mo’Kelly as an employee from a different show. He didn't "hire" Mo'Kelly.
Maybe it was just “coincidence.” And maybe it was also “coincidence” how it was a widely and openly discussed issue...you know, the dearth of African-Americans and whether it was conscious in nature or purely "coincidental." As they say, “coincidences happen.” Maybe there are fewer "coincidences" now on his present shows.
Maybe...
Not only that, from internal (and widely discussed) “alleged questionable comments” of Seacrest directly to Caucasions with African-American spouses, or significant others in his employ, to the program he presently executive produces, Momma’s Boy (which has received considerable criticism for featuring a race-baiting mother)…Seacrest his “questionable.”
And no, Mo’Kelly isn’t making another one of the underhanded comments about his sexuality…nope, just his mentality.
Click HERE
When Mo’Kelly writes the book…he’ll tell it all. This is FIRSTHAND knowledge. No, Mo'Kelly is not saying Ryan Seacrest dislikes African-Americans or is a closet racist. You will never read anywhere that Mo'Kelly said that. Mo'Kelly IS saying that his jerk quotient is high with a number of "coincidences" along the way.
The entertainment community is very, very small with long memories. If “hypothetically,” “hypothetically” there were ever an untoward remark about Jolie, and/or her adopted African children; it would explain the public disdain and easily at that. In fact, it would be reasonable given Mo’Kelly’s personal knowledge of Seacrest.
While working for him, it wasn’t uncommon for Seacrest to “address you” through a third person, his assistant…although you were standing in directly in front of him. You know,…as if you weren’t there.
“Yeah, Claudine…tell Mo’Kelly we’re ready to start.”
“Uh, Ryan…Mo'Kelly is standing right in front of you fool. Claudine, it’s ok, Mo’Kelly’s ears work just fine.”
Maybe it was “only” Mo’Kelly who experienced that. Maybe my ethnicity was also just a “coincidence.”
Yes, one of many “coincidences.” Yes, many coincidences that will go into the “book” one day. Mo’Kelly has a great story about the day he had an African-American employee removed from his TV show set, because he SPOKE to
Not the actress, who wasn’t even within 300 feet…the PUBLICIST.
FIRSTHAND knowledge…and witness to this “coincidence.”
Again, Mo'Kelly is not saying Ryan Seacrest dislikes African-Americans or is a closet racist. You will NEVER read anywhere that Mo'Kelly said that. Mo'Kelly IS saying that his jerk quotient is high with a number of "coincidences" along the way.
But back to Jolie…
Remember, this is all “hypothetical.” Mo’Kelly doesn’t “know” the specific reasons behind the public diss of Seacrest, let’s be abundantly clear. But Mo’Kelly does know a thing or two about Seacrest.
The jerk quotient is high. The coincidences are...well, astounding.
If you’ve ever seen the clip of Seacrest’s cameo in the movie, Knocked Up, some many erroneously would assume he’s "acting." Actually, that’s EXACTLY how Seacrest is!
So yes, one can only imagine the precipitating events which led up to Jolie dissing Seacrest. No such display on the world entertainment stage ever happens haphazardly. She knew the world was watching and knew clearly who she was not going to acknowledge on any level. The diss of Seacrest was real and revealing at the same time. It makes Mo’Kelly wonder out loud if it is another “coincidence.”
They do “happen” you know…especially when the jerk quotient is high.
The Mo'Kelly Report is an entertainment journal with a political slant; published weekly at www.eurweb.com. It is meant to inform, infuse and incite meaningful discourse...as well as entertain. The Mo’Kelly Report is syndicated by Newstex and Blogburst. For more Mo’Kelly, http://www.mokellyreport.blogspot.com.
Morris W. O'Kelly can be reached at mokellyreport@sbcglobal.net and he welcomes all commentary.





























3 comments:
Greeting! What do you think of wow gold? I always lack of wow gold to buy some great item for my char before the wow patch 3.1 and I need to do wow power leveling for the cheapest wow gold or I have to search cheap wow gold on google search. The world changed since the 3.1 patch released. Short of buy wow gold for me wasn't so high frequency now. And I’m curious why this situation happened? The items became cheap? Or we can farm wow gold much easy? Hope someone can give me an answer.
1。那混合物是更缓慢的 ... 但是 Lexus 的即将到来混合的版本 ' 将是比气体气体更快的唯一的版本如好地有更多马力。不要自夸速度,但是我被吸引上轮流开车送行为 90,但是警察给我一次休息。
2。那不是很多气 体
将被节省 ... 只是通过在城市乘公交车往返我储蓄过来 $ 5000/yr 与我的以前的汽车,吉普车切诺基相比。超过 5 年,会是 $ 更不用说会进一步增强我的储蓄的最近的比率远足的 20K。这样除非你是在你的父母的地产上吸的一个浪费的儿子,你的声明是一束公牛。
3. 想象我的45 英里的上下班交通操纵(90 r/t)和
45mpg 每天是 2 加仑在我的旧车上>与 8 加>仑相>比。那每天是 6 >加仑的一笔>储蓄, 120 加仑每月, 1440 加仑每年或者 5040 美元(根据 3.5 美元/加仑) ... 加上它发表 1/10th CO2。多愚蠢是它不要骑一个,去算进今天和年龄。
4.缺少了解 ... 是真的,实际上我个人这样那样喜欢它我可能享受所有鼓励;税,合伙用车,免费停车米, prius 业主之间的秘密的信号,等等;这样自私地说那我真地在那里在享受在所有气体汽车业主上的所有权那没有一个想法多少我这辆汽车有的嬉戏。我 junked 我的 SL,郊区对我的 Prius ... 你应该也。
Post a Comment